Title: Peyman Jamshidi’s Lawyer Affirms Confidence in Judicial Process, Cites Public Support
In a recent development concerning the legal case involving Iranian artist and former footballer Peyman Jamshidi, his legal counsel has publicly detailed the proceedings, expressing strong confidence in the judicial system and the eventual outcome.
A Vote of Confidence from the Public
In an exclusive interview, Kambiz Borjas, Mr. Jamshidi’s lawyer, began by extending gratitude to the Iranian public. He described the people as a “de facto jury alongside the court,” whose feedback in public spaces and online platforms has demonstrated a fair and measured perspective on the case. Borjas emphasized that his client holds the law and the judicial process in the highest regard.
Voluntary Court Appearance and Unsubstantiated Claims
The lawyer clarified that Mr. Jamshidi appeared in court voluntarily and with full respect for the legal summons following a complaint. Borjas firmly stated that the serious allegations leveled against his client are entirely without substantiation or supporting evidence from a legal standpoint.
He took the opportunity to address what he termed as “unfortunate” and “misleading” speculation circulating outside the official legal channels. Borjas issued a stern warning against individuals, including some with legal backgrounds, who he accused of spreading unverified claims about the case, asserting that such actions are contrary to legal protocols.
Appellate Court Decision Underscores Legal Position
A key point in the lawyer’s statement was the reference to the decision by the Tehran Province Court of Appeal to revoke the initial temporary detention order. Borjas highlighted this judicial action as a significant indicator of the weaknesses in the case presented by the plaintiffs. He explained that according to legal procedure, such a revocation by the appellate court suggests a lack of compelling evidence warranting continued detention.
Looking Ahead: Resilience and a Return to Normalcy
Despite the personal and professional toll of the allegations, Borjas expressed that Mr. Jamshidi, known for his longstanding positive reputation in sports and arts, remains resilient. The lawyer affirmed his client’s intention to return to his professional commitments promptly, buoyed by the support he has received and a steadfast belief in his innocence.
In conclusion, Borjas reiterated his professional and personal belief in Mr. Jamshidi’s innocence, grounded in his review of the case details. He affirmed his full trust that the competent judicial authorities will ultimately deliver a ruling that exonerates his client, allowing the legal process to reach its just conclusion.