Title: Communications Expert Ali Rabi’i Questions the Efficacy of Internet Filtering
Introduction
In a significant critique of current digital policies, Ali Rabi’i, the head of the Iranian Association for Cultural and Communication Studies, has raised pointed questions about the strategic rationale behind widespread internet filtering. His comments highlight a focus on public sentiment and the practical outcomes of such regulatory measures.
A Question of Public Satisfaction and Security
Speaking to the press, Rabi’i presented a stark figure, stating that an estimated 85 percent of Iran’s population uses circumvention tools to bypass filtering restrictions. He argued that this widespread practice indicates a significant gap between policy and public adoption. Addressing security concerns often cited to justify filtering, Rabi’i, claiming insider knowledge, asserted that security breaches occur just as frequently on domestic platforms as they do on international ones.
The Dual Burden on Citizens
The communications expert elaborated on the multifaceted impact of filtering. He posed a critical question to policymakers, asking, “What is the rationale behind a policy that simultaneously creates public dissatisfaction and questions the people’s security?” Rabi’i contended that far from guaranteeing safety, the current filtering system, by generating widespread discontent, acts in a manner that is counterproductive to national security interests.
A Call for Supportive Social Policies
Emphasizing the need for a new approach in the post-war era, Rabi’i advocated for social policies that are more aligned and cooperative with society. He highlighted the tangible economic burden on families, noting that a portion of household expenses is now dedicated to purchasing VPNs and filter-breakers. This, he concluded, is a direct source of public grievance that merits serious attention from officials.