Iran’s Diplomatic Veteran: Geneva Talks Signal Serious US Engagement, Tehran Prioritizes Dialogue
Tehran, Iran – A veteran Iranian diplomat, Seyed Ali Saghaian, has offered a revealing analysis of the second round of indirect talks between Iran and the United States in Geneva, suggesting a potentially serious shift in the Trump administration’s approach. In an interview with ISNA, Saghaian underscored Iran’s deep diplomatic experience and reiterated Tehran’s unwavering commitment to negotiation over conflict amidst complex geopolitical dynamics.
Decades of Diplomacy, Enduring Challenges
Saghaian, a former diplomat, highlighted Iran’s extensive history of engaging with American counterparts, describing this experience as a “valuable treasure.” He noted over 400 rounds of discussions since the onset of nuclear debates and subsequent sanctions, specifically referencing the landmark diplomatic efforts during President Rouhani’s tenure that led to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
Despite what Saghaian characterized as perceived US non-compliance, indirect talks recommenced earlier this year. However, he stated that the Trump administration “undermined” these initial efforts, followed by actions targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Strategic Readiness Meets Diplomatic Resolve
While acknowledging that Iran’s military and security forces remain on high alert, with their “hands on the trigger,” Saghaian firmly asserted Tehran’s strategic preference for negotiation over conflict. “We have not abandoned the negotiation table,” he affirmed, emphasizing Iran’s consistent pursuit of diplomatic resolution.
He further pointed out that even in the face of what was perceived as repeated instances of US “covenant-breaking,” the Iranian system deliberately opted to pursue negotiations, steadfastly asserting its nuclear rights. Saghaian also referenced recent statements by the Leader, which he said explicitly addressed US military threats and demonstrated their impact.
Geneva Talks: A Glimmer of Serious Engagement?
Commenting on the composition of the negotiating teams in Geneva – Iran’s expert delegation versus Messrs. Witkoff and Kushner for the US – Saghaian observed that despite the smaller American presence, President Trump was reportedly in continuous consultation with his advisors. He suggested that even with a “heavy psychological atmosphere” perceived against Iran in the region, the Americans appeared driven to achieve a tangible result. This current round of talks, Saghaian opined, seemed “more serious” than its predecessor, indicating a genuine desire for substantive negotiation from Trump and his team.
Upholding Rights, Countering External Pressures
Saghaian reiterated Iran’s fundamental right to peaceful nuclear energy, a right he stressed is recognized under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). He asserted that external parties, particularly the “Zionist regime,” attempt to derail the negotiation process through “false narratives and fabricated news” aimed at influencing the American side.
However, he expressed optimism that President Trump appeared focused on achieving an outcome in this round of talks. Saghaian urged Trump’s executive team and advisors to make sound decisions and remain unswayed by what he termed the “negative inducements and lies from the Zionists.” He underscored that Iran’s nuclear rights, acknowledged by the NPT, represent a legitimate demand, especially given Iran’s critical need for nuclear energy in therapeutic and medical applications.
Saghaian’s insights suggest a pivotal moment in US-Iran relations, where Iran maintains its readiness for defense while actively pursuing a diplomatic path, urging the US to recognize its legitimate rights and commit to serious dialogue.
